Gagglescape tracks the flow of venture capital and angel investment in a global economy.

Web 2.0 Ad Revenues Explode
image

Do you want to know the real reason for the Internet's recent surge? Advertising. Here are the third-quarter numbers courtesy Paul Kedrosky.

[email this story] Posted by the editor on 11/16
Canadian Venture Capital Investment: Does It Exist?
image

The Globe and Mail reported Monday that VC investments dropped in the third quarter. Thompson Financial and the Canadian Venture Capital and Private Equity Association claim that VC investment was down over 32 percent from the second quarter.

Notably, non-Canadian VC investment in our markets grew by 67 percent over a year ago. That's not surprising. Given that Canadian technology investments provide some of the best returns anywhere, outperforming their U.S. counterparts, what smart investor wouldn't want to pick up the opportunities local VC firms are all too willing to ignore.

Are we moving towards 1996 levels of VC investment? Will pulling the plug on Income Trusts result in more early stage investment in Canadian companies? We can only hope.


[email this story] Posted by the editor on 11/15
Israel Wonders If Venture Capital Is Dead
image

Percent of funds raised by Israeli Tech companies in Q1-3, 2005

We are looking a little further afield today than is our norm but headlines from Israel caught our attention. It turns out that when one U.S. VC firm, Sevin Rosin, cancelled its 10th fund recently because management said they no longer believed that venture capital had a future, it had a ripple effect in the Israeli marketplace. Many are questioning VC first-principles.
Chemi Peres says that at Pitango too, they have been asking themselves the tough question - does the venture capital model work? “My answer is that it does. I do not believe that we can predict what will happen in the long-term future, but I do believe that venture capital is the only answer for innovation and entrepreneurship. I cannot see how new innovative technology companies will manage to function otherwise. There will be a place for venture capital as long as we have innovation and entrepreneurship.”


Vertex managing partner Yoram Oron says:
“It’s true that these investments have yielded a low return due to the small number of IPOs, as a result of the more stringent market regulation, but 9 out of 10 exits in the US last year were through acquisition deals in which the return on investment is very high. The return on these deals is exceptionally high because the buyers are technology companies which prefer, for financial and organizational reasons, to acquire an off-balance sheet R&D activity which will not be seen in the company’s financial statements, and which will not affect the organizational character of a mature, publicly-traded company. These companies are willing to pay five times the R&D costs of start-up companies, and this is very worthwhile for investors.”

The final judgment on VC markets remains as elusive in Israel as it (...read more...)
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 11/08
MIT Enterprise Forum This Wednesday Evening
If you haven't had the opportunity to attend the MIT Enterprise Forum yet, then this Wednesday's scheduled topic is a good reason to come. Event coordinator Mark Lawrence of North Crest Partners writes this update today:

Look at Today's National Post - Financial Post for Cover Story on
Evertz Technologies - IPO Success of 2006 - The Story of How This Company Achieved A Successful IPO without ever needing outside VC funding - A Business Case Presentation and Panel Discussion

Back by popular demand is our Business Case Study with Brian Campbell EVP Business Development of Evertz talking about the trials and tribulations of how Evertz, now with a $1 billion market cap, became a world leading provider of equipment to the broadcasting industry. Join Brian and our three leading industry panelists to hear them talk about and critique, question and examine the path that Evertz has taken. The event is interactive with participation and questions from the audience most welcome.

We also have a guest mini presentation by the Ontario Centres of Excellence about the resources it provides entrepreneurs.

The Toronto Chapter of the MIT Enterprise Forum is one of 24 worldwide. We invite participation from alumni of any institution. You do not need to be an MIT Grad or be invited by one. We are a not-for-profit organization designed to be a forum and networking event for technology entrepreneurs, investors and service providers.




Register today at: https://alum.mit.edu/smarTrans/user/Register.dyn?eventID=7737&groupID=921
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 11/06
Singapore Invests In Start-Ups
image


NewsAsia reports that Global Entrepolis SIngapore launched something with the catchy title of "HOTFunds" (Hub of Technopreneurs Funds).

Of course, gagglescape.com loves to look at regions of the world where they actually believe their future economic well-being depends on stimulating and supporting young companies. In Ontario's fat, Income Trust inspired financial climate, we don't believe in the future - only the past.

Singapore, on the other hand, started the whole "Asian Tiger" movement back in the eighties and nineties and knows how important it is to have an economic vision. In this case they created a new venture capital fund worth S$530 million. Here is a quote that will make local entrepreneurs weep:
"We see large pockets of innovation developing particularly in Singapore, China, India and across Asia because of the increase in research & development and the government's focus on encouraging innovation," says Pierre Hennes, partner at Upstream Ventures.

"So for us, the venture capital and angel investors play a fundamental role in fostering that and helping the young entrepreneur take that risk to start a business in the global and regional market."

Venture capital investors at HOTFunds say Singapore, with its small market size, is ideal for start-ups to establish itself [sic] and make early mistakes before venturing out to the regional and global market.

Amen. Now that the Income Trust pork barrel is done can you guys in the financial community get back to fundamentals. It is fundamental to our economy that we compete with the Singapore's of the world. If we don't we will be a 3rd-class nation selling water and oil - for as long as it lasts - to other countries who invested in their economic future.
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 11/03
What Are The Top Emerging Companies? Be Ready For A Surprise
On the weekend, Funding Post announced the winners of the "Third Annual Pitching Across America" competition. They claim that it is the largest venture capital competition ever held. Think "The Dragon's Den" to the power of 10 and you'll have an idea of their process.

Over 100 venture capital funds and angel investors judged the pitches of some 300 businesses in the United States. Rated on a scale of 1 to 10 of venture worthiness, the emerging companies vied for top place in the competition. Who won? Was it a Web 2.0 company? Nope. It was, drum roll... a glass manufacturer. SPD Control System produces a controllable window that enhances energy conservation. Sounds like a worthy product.

Who was second? Surely a social-networking firm. No, again. Graft Solutions Inc. grabbed the runner-up spot. They make surgical grafts.

O.K. Third? No Internet company again. This time it is a nanotechnology company, NanoPolyQ of California.

Here is the top ten list:

SPD Control Systems Corp. NY
Digital Media Research FL
Graft Solutions, Inc. GA
WebWire GA
NanoPolyQ CA
Amyxa Pharmaceuticals MA
Shield Technology Group FL
Celldonate Inc. CA
Declude MA
MarColl International Corp. NE
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 11/02
Income Trusts Die A Well-Deserved Death
image


I have never been a fan of income trusts. First, they offload tax to individuals who are often less capable of managing the load and, far more importantly, they stymy innovation in our financial sector. Why bother investing in companies that may have a strong future when you can invest in an income stream from a mature business? Income trusts vacuumed up strong but infexible companies like the Yellow Pages but had no interest in the possibility of new markets. R&D investment? What's that?

That is why when BCE decided it wanted to become an income trust the government had no choice but to say, "hold on there, somebody has to keep us competitive in the non-energy sector." You may remember that when BCE said it was going that route it also decide to concentrate on "well-established" businesses. No. More. Innovation.

That was bad enough but here is a IT side-effect that no one seemed to talk about over the past few years: one of the reasons, I speculate, that Ontario's venture capital market has been so soft is that with everyone in Toronto's financial sector chasing big, fat income trust conversions they had no time left to prime the entrepreneurial pump. That left a lot of good startups at the bottom of a Darwinian, survival of the fittest, pond.

So, the income trust king is dead! It is about time and we wonder how the markets are going to react this morning to the news. Entrepreneurs, it is time to dust off those financing pitches and hit Bay Street again. Who knows, they may just have time to listen to you now.
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 11/01
Is DIGG Worth $150 Million?
image

According to Techcrunch.com, the upstart story ranking service http://www.digg.com, is being offered $150 million by News Corp.

If a firm offer isn’t made in the next week or so north of $150 million, look for Digg to close a $5+ million second round of financing later this year, possibly with Greylock Partners. Greylock is already an investor in Digg, leading their $2.8 million Series A round in October 2005 (Omidyar Network and several angel investors also participated in the round).
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/30
Guaranteeing Failure
Persistenceunlimited.com has a concise, funny, and truthful top ten list of what to do to guarantee failure in your life. Want to know what not to do? Here is the list:

1. Make your goals vague.

2. Make your goals difficult to visualize.

3. Think and speak negatively about your goals.

4. Avoid planning incremental steps.

5. Don't do - talk.

6. Wait until you are motivated.

7. Don't set a date.

8. List why it's impossible.

9. Don't research your goal.

10. Think of anything except your goal.
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/26
Where Do You Stand On The Algorithm Vs. Group Intelligence Question?
In the Web 2.0 world there is one great question that determines if your an Internet Republican or Internet Democrat: Are you for algorithms or for group intelligence? As everyone who doesn't live under a rock knows, Google believes in the power of the algorithm. Their famous Google search-engine rocketed to the top based on its proprietary web page ranking system. No need for the subjectivity of mortals there. They are all about the power of government.

Sites like Digg.com, on the other hand, are all about what its readers think is important or interesting. Ah, democracy. The problem is, sometimes democracies can make governing a messy process, interesting but not in line with quarterly reports. Still, Digg is a rapidly growing service.

Touchstone has an in-depth blog about the great divide. Take a look.
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/25
Marc Canter on social-networks and location-based blogging
This video was shot at a Web 2.0 conference in Ireland. Canter gives a four minute overview of Web 2.0's end game.

The synergism of social-networking and the Net are just now beginning to gel. This short video provides a glimpse into where market forces are taking us.
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/18
Leaving Toronto: A Non-Rapid Tranist Story
I am on my way to New York to present at an urban design and sustainability symposium hosted by the United Nations.

I decided to take the only mass transit option to get to the airport rather than take a cab. I hiked to the TTC subway station and had a relatively easy 23 minute ride to Kipling station. Then things got funky. Instead of the 192 "Express" bus arriving on time, it was ten minutes late. One normal city bus connects the subway to Canada's biggest airport. It runs every twenty minutes. Sort of. There wasn't room for one additional passenger and their bags when the bus left.

Can you imagine if London, England or Paris offered similar system? Not easily. This is why Porter Air is allowed to exist. people have no faith in our public infrastructure and, if today's experience is an indication, it is understandable.

Think of how fewer taxis would be polluting our air if we could do something as simple as having a real express bus system leaving the Kipling station every five minutes. It would be an inexpensive solution to a grave problem. Even if it cost $5 more I know many people would pay if, only if, they could depend on it.

This Thursday evening I am moderating a panel (see Sunday's posting) with some local politicians. While the panel is not about our transit system per, it is about community development. Without a sustainable, effective transit system community development in our city will always be an illusion no matter how well-considered.
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/17
Analyse This: Google’s Return On YouTube Investment
image" Instacalc.com has this financial analysis of the Google/YouTube deal. It is a reveiling picture and their instant calculator software is fun too.
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/17
Friendster’s Precautionary Tale
image
The New York Times "Your Money" section offers up a precautionary tale to all of those entrepreneurs who think they'll be the next Google or YouTube. Back in 2002-03 when online social-networking was just beginning to get traction, the biggest player was Friendster. Google offered owner Jonathan Abrahms $30 million for his product. he declined. Had he taken the money and stock offer Abrahms would be worth over a billion dollars today. Not bad for one year's work back in 2002.

Instead, Friendster has slipped down the scale of social-networking properties to rank in the mid-teens. it still is a worthwhile property but . . .
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/16
More About YouTube
David Dalka has put together ten unanswered questions about the YouTube Google deal:

10 Unanswered Questions:

1. Will users stay with the recently scrubbed and censored Youtube or will they migrate to other alternatives?

2. Why are the investment analysts and “major media” only allowed on the announcement conference call? Why not bloggers, why not the person, Michael Arrington, who broke the rumor and story in the first place?

3. Why can’t the Investor Relations, Press and Blogs at Google ever be in sync? The Official Google Blog still has no information about it. Instead there are posts on “Inside Macs at Google”…very strange.

4. This is what a multi-million dollar rat looks like, will the next of kin receive their fair share?

5. The Google Press Release states “This afternoon, we announced that we are acquiring YouTube for $1.65 billion in stock. YouTube will operate independently following the close of the transaction, which is expected in the fourth quarter of this year.” Why is this the first company that Google has ever kept independent?

6. There are a few theories on number five. I’m no lawyer, but if it’s kept as a seperate legal entity, it might be able to limit any content liabilities to that entity?

7. How much is 44 seconds of everyone’s time (maybe a bit more now) worth?

8. Eric was forceful in the call about stating that these will remain seperate entities and curiously he asserted Google Video will become even more important. Am I the only one that is mildly confused by this statement? Or is there some larger segmentation or story here?

9. Many people have asked “Why didn’t Microsoft buy Youtube?” With a large stake held by the people who funded Google, it was clear that Google had the right to make (...read more...)
[email this story] Posted by the editor on 10/12
Page 5 of 11 pages « First  <  3 4 5 6 7 >  Last »
Mapping App.
Empower your City.
Click here.

Local News
In recognition of his latest innovation, Stuart Foster, a pioneer and world authority in ultrasound microimaging, has won the 2006 Manning Award of Distinction.

The Monster Employment Index Canada soared by 12 points in August to a new high of 130 amid a strong rebound in online recruitment activity across Canada. Five out of 10 job classifications tracked by the Index advanced during August, led by occupations in healthcare; education and government; culture and sport; sales; and, business, finance and administration.

Axia NetMedia Corporation announces that it has entered into binding agreements with VINCI Networks.

Absolute Software Honored in Wall Street Journal Awards for Technology Innovation Computrace Data Protection product named Runner-up in competition as Absolute becomes only Canadian firm to win an award.

Dr. Franz Fink has been appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of Gennum Corporation. Dr. Fink has also been appointed to the company's Board of Directors.

Certicom Corp. (TSX: CIC) announced that Michael Epstein, manager of technology and standards at Philips Electronics Intellectual Property Division, will speak at the Certicom ECC Conference on November 14-16 in Toronto, Canada.

Simon Tuck over at Globe Investor has a story on the cost and the benefits the country's "Technology Partnerships Canada" fund. It is worth reading if for no other reason than to realize how much the technology sector in this country depends on government aid.

U.S.-based Global CONNECT and MaRS - a Canadian convergence innovation centre - announced they will hold the 2006 Global CONNECT annual conference in Toronto, Ontario. The conference will be held December 6 through 8 at the MaRS Centre in Toronto.

Communitech: Waterloo Region Technology Association, announced that it will receive $1 million over the next three years from the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation to help entrepreneurs and researchers transform innovations into marketable products and to bridge the gap between the business and research communities.

BDC and Flintbox - an online platform for marketing and licensing academic research in Canada - announce a partnership to create a new research commercialization solution.

Page 8 of 12 pages « First  <  6 7 8 9 10 >  Last »
Syndicate


Services
Stories By
Syndicate
Link Roll